School Accountability Report Card    
  Reported for School Year 2005-06  

Published During 2006-07

The School Accountability Report Card (SARC), which is required by law to be published annually, contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. More information about SARC requirements is available at the California Department of Education (CDE) Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest, an online data tool at http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/, contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state.

I. About This School

Contact Information
This section provides the school's contact information.
SchoolDistrict
 School Name Winship Middle District Name Eureka City Unified
 Street 2500 Cypress Ave. Phone Number 707-441-2400
 City, State, Zip Eureka, CA    95503-6213 Web Site http://www.eurekacityschools.org
 Phone Number 707-441-2487  Superintendent Denise C. Jones
 Principal Paul Gossard  E-mail Address jonesdc@eurekacityschools.org
 E-mail Address gossardpaul@eurekacityschools.org  --- ---

School Description and Mission Statement
This section provides information about the school's goals and programs.
Winship Middle School enjoys a positive reputation in the community for providing a strong academic program and a school climate that is conducive to success for middle school learners. Sixth, seventh, and eighth grade students engage with a strong standards-based curriculum in all subject areas. School-wide programs such as the computer-based Accelerated Reader and Accelerated Math, Step Up to Writing, and the Raise Responsibility System (a school behavior plan), enhance learning opportunities for all students. Our after-school program provides academic support and enrichment opportunities for approximately 130 students per day.

Surrounded by redwood trees, the beautiful Winship campus has been enhanced by recent bond and modernization projects. A new multi-purpose room was constructed and classrooms and the office were remodeled. Construction was completed in Spring, 2006. Current enrollment is 639 students. 

Winship’s Academic Performance Index (API) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) show continued growth. Our 2006 API is 813, a growth of 32 since 2005. We met all Federal Adequate Yearly Progress criteria in 2006.

Major Achievements:

  • Student involvement in clubs, intramural sports, and community service continues to increase. Students enjoy participating in over 12 clubs on campus, year-round intramural tournaments, and afterschool community service projects.
  • Our After School Program continues to support one third of our students each trimester in academics and enrichment activities. Over half of our students participate on a yearly basis.
  • Our “Push-In” resource program, which provides extra help in the regular classroom setting, continues to be successful. We will refine the program to ensure success for all students with disabilities.

Focus for Improvement:

  • Continue using the Accelerated Reader and Accelerated Math programs to move all students towards the proficient level in reading and math on standardized tests.
  • Create an academics-only seventh period in the afterschool program. Students will enroll in classes for extra help (intervention) in reading and math, homework support, tutor time, or credit make-up to improve basic skills and increase our graduation rate.
  • Establish English learner classes by grade level and by proficiency levels, as measured by the California English Language Development Test. These assessments will help us coordinate instruction for English learners with the students’ language arts classes. In most cases, if not all, the language arts teacher will be the English Language Development teacher.
  • Writing scores are of the highest concern at Winship. We will establish a schoolwide writing program: Step up to Writing.

The active Winship PTSA provides support for valuable school programs such as Red Ribbon Week. Our monthly Lunch on the Lawn provides an opportunity for parents to join their child at school for lunch. Please come visit us; we would love to show you around. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate call.

Mission Statement: The mission of Winship Middle School, a collaborative community of dedicated students, families and staff, is to empower and inspire each student to maximize academic success and social development by providing a challenging, standards-driven curriculum in a creative, nurturing environment of mutual respect.


Opportunities for Parental Involvement
This section provides information about opportunities for parents to become involved with school activities.
We are proud of our parent involvement at Winship. We have a strong PTSA, which provides many social activities for parents and students. The most popular is Lunch on the Lawn, which occurs the second Tuesday each month. Parents come to school to have lunch with their child and other families and friends. Our School Site Council, as well as various volunteers, are committed to our constant goal of school improvement. The following list identifies the many ways in which parents can be involved in their child’s education: Parent Conferences are scheduled twice every school year; a monthly school newsletter with information regarding the following month’s school activities is mailed home each month; parenting workshops and informational meetings are scheduled regularly; an orientation meeting for new Winship parents is scheduled every spring; Student Award Assemblies are scheduled regularly and parents are mailed an invitation to attend; progress reports are mailed home twice each trimester; parents can monitor their child’s attendance and current grades through PowerSchool; parents can e-mail any staff member; and Back to School Night is scheduled every fall.

Student Enrollment by Grade Level
This table displays the number of students enrolled in each grade level at the school.
 Grade Level Number of Students Grade Level Number of Students
 Kindergarten Grade 8 228 
 Grade 1 Ungraded Elementary
 Grade 2 Grade 9
 Grade 3 Grade 10
 Grade 4 Grade 11
 Grade 5 Grade 12
 Grade 6 167  Ungraded Secondary
 Grade 7 227  Total Enrollment 622 

Student Enrollment by Group
This table displays the percent of students enrolled at the school who are identified as being in a particular group.
 Group Percent of
Total Enrollment
 Group Percent of
Total Enrollment
 African American 1.6  White (not Hispanic) 68.3 
 American Indian or Alaska Native 12.9  Multiple or No Response 0.0 
 Asian 7.1  Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 45.5 
 Filipino 0.6  English Learners 7.0 
 Hispanic or Latino 7.6  Students with Disabilities 10.0 
 Pacific Islander 1.9  --- ---

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
This table displays by grade level the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom).
 Grade
Level
 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
 K            
 1            
 2            
 3            
 4            
 5            
 6 25.4  5  28.2  6  26.2  6 
 K-3            
 3-4            
 4-8            
 Other            

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)
This table displays by subject area the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom).
 Subject 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
 English 29.5 1 12 6 25.7 4 12 4 26.5 4 10 4
 Mathematics 28.2  13 2 26.5 3 12 2 27.4 2 10 4
 Science 29.3  15 2 29.1 1 14 2 28.2 1 16 2
 Social Science 30.4  11 4 29.9  11 4 27.3 1 11 4


II. School Climate

School Safety Plan
This section provides information about the school's comprehensive safety plan.
The Winship Safe Schools Plan was last reviewed and updated on March 1, 2006.  Key components are:

Component 1- The Social Climate

Goal 1: Create a caring, safe and supportive environment

Objective:  By September 2006, all staff and students will implement the Raise Responsibility System (RSS).

Goal 2:  To promote a higher degree of respect between student groups

Objective:  By February 2007, 80% of all students  will report experiencing increased mutual respect at school.

Component 2- the Physical Environment

Goal 1:  To reduce campus litter and increase campus beautification.

Objective:  By December 2006, the custodial staff will spend less of their on-duty time cleaning up litter on campus.

Goal 2:  To continue to improve campus safety and security.

Objective:  By December 2006, 85% of all students and staff will report feeling safe in regards to physical, social and/or cultural aspects as identified in surveys.


School Discipline Practices
This section provides information about the school's efforts to create and maintain a positive learning environment, including the school's use of disciplinary strategies.
Middle School is a time for adolescents to make choices, but also to rely on the guidance and counsel of adults who are important in their lives. At Winship Middle School, we use 3 levels of social development to help us teach our students how to succeed in school and in life.

The 3 levels of social development are summarized below. All students should be able to classify a behavior as one of these levels.

3.  Acceptable & exemplary level.

Student motivated by an internal force.   Does the right thing for personal reasons.  Self-controlled, self-motivated, mature.  Kind, compassionate, considerate & caring.  Responsible, respectful, & honest.

2.  Acceptable & appropriate level.

Student manipulated by an outside force.   External motivation of bribes or threats.  Does the right thing when teacher is watching.  Conforms to what peers are doing.   Complies with accepted class standards.

3.  Unacceptable & inappropriate level.

         Child must be bossed into behaving.   Bullies others. Makes up own rules.

         Disturbs the learning experience. Violates accepted classprocedures/standards.

         Selfish, unkind, uncaring.

Students who operate on the upper two levels of social development are exhibiting the following behavior expectations:

  • Respect yourself and others.
  • Be safe at all times.
  • Allow others to learn without distraction.
  • Do your work during the whole class period.
  • Follow all teacher directions the first time.
  • Bring your supplies.
  • Do your best.
  • Dress appropriately.
  • Attend school every day/be on time to class.
  • Make up missed work.

With this in mind, rewards are not given for expected behavior just as society does not give rewards for behaving properly. Also, irresponsible behavior is seen as an opportunity for growth rather than for punishment.

Our approach encourages students to exercise self-discipline through self-evaluation and reflection. Students learn to control their own behavior rather than relying on the teachers for control.

We want our classrooms to be encouraging and conductive to learning at all times. In this way, young people develop positive attitudes and behavioral skills that are so necessary for successful lives.

Winship Middle School has an effective conflict resolution program that teaches appropriate ways to solve problems. The resolution process begins with our Conflict Mediation program.  A team of eighth graders is nominated by students and staff to be trained as dispute managers. Two trained mediators meet with the two disputing students and follow a step-by-step process that leads to a settlement agreeable to both disputants.  This peer program has been very successful at Winship and is an excellent opportunity for students to learn how to solve their problems in a responsible manner.


Suspensions and Expulsions
This table displays the rate of suspensions and expulsions (the total number of incidents divided by the total enrollment) at the school and district levels for the most recent three-year period.
 Rate School District
 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
 Suspensions 87 62 77 643 588 671
 Expulsions 8 2 0 17 9 10

III. School Facilities

School Facility Conditions and Improvements
This section provides information about the condition of the school's grounds, buildings, and restrooms, and a description of any planned or recently completed facility improvements.
Surrounded by redwood trees, the beautiful Winship campus has been enhanced by recent bond and modernization projects.  A new multi-purpose room was constructed and classrooms and the office were remodeled.   Construction was completed in Spring, 2006.

School Facility Conditions Good Repair Status
This table displays the results of the most recently completed school site inspection to determine the school facility's good repair status.
 Item Inspected
 Facility in
Good Repair
 Repair Needed and
Action Taken or Planned
 Yes No
 Gas Leaks
x
   
 Mechanical Systems
x
   
 Windows/Doors/Gates (interior and exterior)
x
   
 Interior Surfaces (walls, floors, and ceilings)
x
   
 Hazardous Materials (interior and exterior)
x
   
 Structural Damage
x
   
 Fire Safety
x
   
 Electrical (interior and exterior)
x
   
 Pest/Vermin Infestation
x
   
 Drinking Fountains (inside and outside)
x
   
 Restrooms
x
   
 Sewer
x
   
 Playground/School Grounds
x
   
 Other
   

IV. Teachers

Teacher Credentials
This table displays the number of teachers assigned to the school with a full credential, without a full credential, and those teaching outside of their subject area of competence. Detailed information about teacher qualifications can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
 Teachers School District
   2003-04     2004-05     2005-06     2005-06  
 With Full Credential 31 29 30 262
 Without Full Credential 0 0 0 0
 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence    ---

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
This table displays the number of teacher misassignments (teachers assigned without proper legal authorization) and the number of vacant teacher positions (not filled by a single designated teacher assigned to teach the entire course at the beginning of the school year or semester). Note: Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.
 Indicator   2004-05     2005-06     2006-07  
 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners   
 Total Teacher Misassignments   
 Vacant Teacher Positions   

Core Academic Classes Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers
This table displays the percent of classes in core academic subjects taught by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) compliant and non-NCLB compliant teachers at the school, at all schools in the district, at high-poverty schools in the district, and at low-poverty schools in the district. More information on teacher qualifications required under NCLB can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/.
 Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
 Taught by
 NCLB Compliant Teachers
 Taught by
 Non-NCLB Compliant Teachers
 This School  81.5 18.5
 All Schools in District  84.0 16.0
 High-Poverty Schools in District  94.0 6.0
 Low-Poverty Schools in District  0.0 0.0

Substitute Teacher Availability
This section provides information about the availability of qualified substitute teachers and the impact of any difficulties in this area on the school's instructional program.
Eureka City Schools is committed to utilizing fully credentialed teachers as substitutes when the regular teacher is unavailable. This ensures that a competent teacher is in the classroom at all times. When necessary, emergency credential status is requested.

Teacher Evaluation Process
This section provides information about the procedures and the criteria for teacher evaluations.
The evaluation of probationary teachers and permanent teachers is conducted according to state guidelines. Appraisal of teachers’ performance is tied directly to the California Standard for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) that includes:
• Engaging and Supporting all Students in Learning
• Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Learning
• Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
• Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students
• Assessing Student Learning
Support for beginning teachers is available through the Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment program (BTSA). Based on the CSTP, support for the beginning teacher is specific and evidence based. Attention to learning environment, content standards, formative assessment, reflective practice, and collaboration allows the beginning teacher to focus upon what and how the students are learning.

V. Support Staff

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff
This table displays, in units of full-time equivalents (FTE), the number of academic counselors and other support staff who are assigned to the school and the average number of students per academic counselor. One FTE equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.
 Title Number of FTE
 Assigned to School
 Average Number of
 Students per
 Academic Counselor
 Academic Counselor  1.0  622.0
 Library Media Teacher (Librarian)  1.0 ---
 Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) 1.0  ---
 Psychologist 0.4  ---
 Social Worker  ---
 Nurse 0.4  ---
 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.4  ---
 Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 1.5  ---
 Other  ---

VI. Curriculum and Instructional Materials

Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials
This table displays information about the quality, currency, and availability of the standards-aligned textbooks and other instructional materials used at the school, and information about the school's use of any supplemental curriculum or non-adopted textbooks or instructional materials.
 Core Curriculum Area Quality, Currency, and
 Availability of Textbooks and
 Instructional Materials
 Percent of Pupils
 Who Lack Their Own
 Assigned Textbooks and
 Instructional Materials
 Reading/Language Arts x 0
 Mathematics x 0
 Science x 0
 History-Social Science x 0
 Foreign Language x 0
 Health x 0
 Science Laboratory Equipment (grades 9-12)   

VII. School Finances

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
This table displays a comparison of the school's per pupil expenditures from unrestricted (basic) sources with other schools in the district and throughout the state, and a comparison of the average teacher salary at the school site with average teacher salaries at the district and state levels. Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.
 Level Total
 Expenditures
 Per Pupil
 Expenditures
 Per Pupil
 (Supplemental)
 Expenditures
 Per Pupil
 (Basic)
 Average
 Teacher
 Salary
 School Site       
 District --- ---   $54,430
 Percent Difference - School Site and District --- ---   
 State --- --- $4,743 $54,823
 Percent Difference - School Site and State --- ---   

Types of Services Funded
This section provides information about the programs and supplemental services that are available at the school and funded through either categorical or other sources.
Title I funds are used to fund reading intervention, the AVID program, library services, after-school program services, staff development and counselor technician services.

SLIBG funds are used for technology services, supplies, equipment and classified salaries.

Title III (LEP) and EIA  funds are used for certificated and classified salaries and supplies.


Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
This table displays district-level salary information for teachers, principals, and superintendents, and compares these figures to the state averages for districts of the same type and size. The table also displays teacher and administrative salaries as a percent of a district's budget, and compares these figures to the state averages for districts of the same type and size. Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/salaries0405.asp.
 Category District
 Amount
 State Average
 For Districts
 In Same Category
 Beginning Teacher Salary $34,000 $36,796
 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $47,932 $54,062
 Highest Teacher Salary $62,000 $68,679
 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $74,987 $83,916
 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $89,326 $86,752
 Average Principal Salary (High) $96,526 $92,915
 Superintendent Salary $140,000 $121,387
 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 40.1 40.2
 Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 7.0 5.8

VIII. Student Performance

California Standards Tests
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. The CSTs include English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2 through 11; science in grades 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11; and history-social science in grades 8, 10, and 11. Student scores are reported as performance levels. Detailed information regarding CST results for each grade and proficiency level, including the percent of students not tested, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

CST Results for All Students -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards).
 Subject School District State
 2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006
 English-Language Arts 47 51 60 39 41 44 36 40 42
 Mathematics 53 59 63 45 46 50 34 38 40
 Science   66 33 40 39 25 27 35
 History-Social Science 28 40 46 31 34 36 29 32 33

CST Results by Student Group - Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards) for the most recent testing period.
 Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
 English-
Language Arts
 Mathematics Science History-
Social Science
 African American * * * *
 American Indian or Alaska Native 57 52 64 48
 Asian 37 58 56 25
 Filipino * * * *
 Hispanic or Latino 44 47 54 43
 Pacific Islander 17 42 * *
 White (Not Hispanic) 66 69 70 50
 Male 55 62 72 55
 Female 65 65 59 37
 Economically Disadvantaged 46 53 51 33
 English Learners 24 42 35 12
 Students with Disabilities 7 15 25 10
 Students Receiving Migrant Education Services    

Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
The norm-referenced test (NRT), currently the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition (CAT/6), shows how well students are doing compared to students nationally in reading, language, spelling, and mathematics in grades 3 and 7 only. The results are reported as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile). Detailed information regarding NRT results for each grade level can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

NRT Results for All Students -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics.
Subject School District State
 2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006
 Reading 56 62 65 49 50 51 43 41 42
 Mathematics 65 66 66 59 62 62 51 52 53

NRT Results by Student Group -- Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics for the most recent testing period.
Group Percent of Students Scoring at or
Above the National Average
 Reading Mathematics
 African American * *
 American Indian or Alaska Native 40 40
 Asian 44 62
 Filipino * *
 Hispanic or Latino 71 50
 Pacific Islander * *
 White (not Hispanic) 72 73
 Male 56 62
 Female 74 70
 Economically Disadvantaged 58 56
 English Learners 43 43
 Students with Disabilities 9 18
 Students Receiving Migrant Education Services  

Local Assessment Results
Districts may choose to administer their own academic assessments in reading and mathematics. In such cases, this table displays the percent of students, by grade level and subject area, meeting or exceeding the district standard.
 Grade
Level
 Reading Mathematics
 2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006
 6 76 76 84 72 77 75
 7 76 69 77 73 72 81
 8 78 82 92 78 84 84

California Physical Fitness Test Results
The California Physical Fitness Test is administered to students in grades 5, 7, and 9 only. This table displays by grade level the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards) for the most recent testing period. Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test, and comparisons of a school's test results to the district and state levels, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
 Grade Level Percent of
Students Meeting
Fitness Standards
 7 41.6

IX. Accountability

Academic Performance Index

The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of the academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800. Detailed information about the API can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/.

API Ranks -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the school's statewide and similar schools API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest 10 percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the school has an API score in the highest 10 percent of all schools in the state. The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100 statistically matched "similar schools." A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school's academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing 10 schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 10 means that the school's academic performance is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools.
 API Rank 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
 Statewide 8 8 8
 Similar Schools 9 10 8

API Changes by Student Group -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays, by student group, the actual API changes in points added or lost for the past three years, and the most recent API score. Note: "N/A" means that the student group is not numerically significant.
 Group Actual API Change API Score
 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006
 All Students at the School 4 17 32 813
 African American    
 American Indian or Alaska Native    
 Asian    
 Filipino    
 Hispanic or Latino    
 Pacific Islander    
 White (not Hispanic) -3 16 39 838
 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -8 17 39 753
 English Learners -- --  
 Students with Disabilities -- --  

State Award and Intervention Programs
This section will contain information about the school's participation in various state intervention and award programs only to the extent these programs were funded for the period addressed by this report.
 
 
 

Adequate Yearly Progress
The federal NCLB act requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria:
Detailed information about AYP, including participation rates and percent proficient results by student group, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/.

AYP Overall and by Criteria
This table displays an indication of whether the school and the district made AYP overall and whether the school and the district met each of the AYP criteria.
 AYP Criteria School District
 Overall Yes No
 Participation Rate - English-Language Arts Yes Yes
 Participation Rate - Mathematics Yes Yes
 Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts Yes No
 Percent Proficient - Mathematics Yes Yes
 API Yes Yes
 Graduation Rate N/A No

Federal Intervention Program
Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (English-language arts or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. Detailed information about PI identification can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/.
 Indicator    School       District   
 Program Improvement Status  Not in PI Not In PI
 First Year of Program Improvement Implementation   
 Year in Program Improvement   
 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement  --- 1
 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement  --- 7.7


X. Instructional Planning and Scheduling

School Instruction and Leadership
This section provides information about the structure of the school's instructional program and the experience of the school's leadership team.
At Winship, the teaching staff is the key to student academic success.  With a wide range of experience and interests, the staff includes published authors, skilled curriculum designers, Humboldt County Teacher of the Year winners and National Board Certification recipients.  Individual staff members pursue their personal passions for music, art, drama and athletics.  A common bond, however, is an uncommon commitment to middle school students.  This commitment means that teachers frequently may be found in their classrooms before school, at snack break or at lunch, providing individual tutoring to students in need of extra help or facilitating a student club or activity.  In addition, many teachers agree to take an extra teaching period in the After-School Program. 
Winship classrooms are not passive places!  We believe that students often learn best by doing, and a walk around the campus would reveal students engaged in learning in active ways.  A Socratic Seminar in an 8th grade language arts class, a role-play in 7th grade social studies, a hands-on 6th grade science experiment and a play on our new stage are typical learning activities.  Teachers question, encourage, celebrate and laugh with their students.  Students work individually, in small groups and sometimes, as when they created a giant American flag, as a whole school. 

The school staff makes it a priority to know each student personally, making sure that there are no anonymous students at Winship.  The school day is configured to allow for maximum student contact.   Sixth graders learn in self-contained classrooms in the morning.  Resource and EL students are clustered to facilitate access to needed services.   After lunch, sixth grade students move to science, electives and P.E classes.  Seventh and eighth graders are scheduled in blocks to help meet the instructional needs of a diverse student population.  Electives include art, music, Spanish, drama, Academic Support, English Language Development, EAST and AVID (described below).  Academic difficulties are addressed  The instructional program at Winship is enhanced through two groundbreaking programs on campus- EAST and AVID.  The Environmental and Spatial Technology (EAST) elective provides opportunities for students to learn in a project-based environment, with a goal of creating projects that are of service to the community.  The goal of the Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) elective is to “create a college-going culture” for students who may not have considered a four-year college as a personal option.  Organizational and note-taking skills help students prepare for successful post-secondary education.

The after-school program provides strong academic support in math and language arts, homework support, community service projects and enrichment opportunities for approximately one third of the Winship student body each day. Over one half of the student population participates over the course of the school year.  Expectations in the After-School Program are the same as those during the school day, and there proactively as teachers, parents and students meet to create Individual Learning Plans for students scoring below the Proficient level on standardized testing.  Translators are available as needed for parent conferences.  Parents are encouraged to monitor student academic progress and attendance on-line through the district’s PowerSchool student information system.   

A key component to the success of the after-school program is that classroom teachers who are paid hourly for their additional teaching responsibilities provide core instruction.  At any given time, 8-10 Winship teachers are teaching after school.  This continuity of instruction helps bridge the gap between the regular school day and the After-School Program.

Just completing his first year as principal of Winship, principal Paul Gossard has 32 years of experience as a successful teacher and school leader at the junior high, elementary and middle school levels.

Professional Development
This section provides information about the program for training the school's teachers and other professional staff.
  Winship teachers are firmly committed to on-going professional growth, and take full advantage of three yearly staff development days.  Recent staff training includes the AVID program, Step Up to Writing and a session with Dr. Kevin Feldman, a leading expert on providing successful reading intervention.   Common prep periods and Monday afternoon collaboration time (made possible by a district-wide early release day) allows teachers the time to work and plan together by grade level teams or subject areas.

Instructional Minutes
This table displays a comparison of the number of instructional minutes offered at the school to the state requirement for each grade level.
 Grade
Level
 Instructional Minutes
 Offered State Requirement
 6  57,207 54,000
 7  57,207 54,000
 8  57,207 54,000


Minimum Days in School Year
This section provides information about the total number of days in the most recent school year that students attended school on a shortened day schedule and the reasons for the shortened day schedule.
13 minimum days include 12 days for parent conferences (6 in the fall and 6 in the spring) and the last day of school.